![]() Also, something could be done about the introductory sentence. If the material is from external sources, those should be acknowledged. It seems to me that the "References" and "External links" sections should be at the bottom of the page, and the section that now follows them should be wikified (section headings and such). I'd like to edit the Operator-precedence grammar article. I normally do a prod instead of asking for a quick deletion but yes this one does look like quick deletion was appropriate. Pnm ( talk) 15:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Reply Oh yes sorry that's what I should have said. It's unlikely to be controversial, and it saves you and others a lot of work. Gonzonoir ( talk) 14:52, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Reply Try a WP:Proposed deletion first. I'll go to AfD with the article if nothing we could use to salvage it is forthcoming soon. ![]() Well, consider this part of my compliance with WP:BEFORE. The onus is on someone to establish it is worth keeping if they want it, not on other editors to prove it should be removed. Gonzonoir ( talk) 14:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Reply Wikipedia:Translation says "Wikipedia consensus is that an unedited machine translation, left as a Wikipedia article, is worse than nothing", which various discussions on the village pump confirms. ![]() If anyone here is able to write (at least) a one-sentence lead explaining what this subject is, we can at least use that to check for notability and sources more effectively than is possible from the title alone. Dmcq ( talk) 14:15, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Reply That would be my hunch I just don't want to write an AfD rationale that boils down to "I don't understand what this article is on about" if that's a function of my ignorance rather than of the article's lack of clarity. Notability hasn't been established and it looks unlikely it ever will be. Gonzonoir ( talk) 13:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Reply Having had a quick look at it the next step is WP:AfD. Googling the title has produced nothing apparently relevant. Does anyone recognise the concept? The text references encryption, but I can't tell whether it is supposed to be a method, a tool, or something else. I may be able to provide more info.My A1 speedy deletion tagging of this article was declined, so you're my next hope of determining what this (apparently machine-translated) article is about. Let me know, if this is not enough, and you can't get it to work. I've no idea, when or if it will become an Okular standard, but jsqliu's edit works perfectly and does the job. Whenever you highlight text, it will copy the contents into the note. To run Okular, terminal must be running for bash commands to be used. # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it existsĮxport PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/where/install/poppler/lib/pkgconfig:$PKG_CONFIG_PATHĮxport LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/where/install/poppler/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PAT To run, I also had to add the following 1) In "~/.bashrc" added:Įxport KDEDIRS=$KDEDIRS:$HOME/install:$(kde4-config -prefix) kbuildsycoca4Ģ) In "~/.profile" added (which is my separate installation folder) Note. Ĭd okular & cd build & cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/install/. git clone -b edit Ĭmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/path/to/your/kde4/install/dir. ![]() If you don't want to install git, then downloading the zip repository from will also work. That is, run the following commands in terminal (should give no fatal erros, though it will give some warnings). Then instead of the original repository you download jsqliu's " edit" branch. To do this you need all the dependencies to build Okular from source. If anyone knows that some of these parts are not necessary, feel free to edit them out. Since I'm a bit computer-distant myself, I'll include approximate instructions to get it running on your computer. The precise file update is seen in this diff. I tested it, and it works exactly as needed, by copying the text into the note contents. Indeed, there is a solution now, and I did not have try and make it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |