I absolutely agree with you about stopping at 38 not making sense - its a mistake I made ,and I didnt recommend anyone to follow it. You're sacrificing it for what? Makes absolutely no sense to stop at 38. The moment AH lands, DF falls behind.ĭefense penalties are negligible in RvR in terms of effectiveness on an even level enemy with equal gear bonuses.ģ8 Weapon means no Evade stun. ![]() Achilles Heel could be evaded, but every other DF had the same chance of being evaded as well. Right now (RR4) I am using 48 CS 38 W 12 LA spec,as it is the most damaging in a period of 20s (optimistic length of stealther life),with the assumption that PA opener succeded.Įven on RR4, 50 LA will outdamage 50 CS spec on a condition that PA Opener has failed (and I guess that is the reason for even hib stealthers to drop CS entirely),and the assumption that we dont get garrote followup-style "Achilles Feet" to land (too much miss-evades - either the garrote or its followup will not land).Īll the above reasons make me want to spec 50 LA as soon as possible ,maybe will even try it on RR5.įri 11:26 AMWhen using 1h weapons, there is no point pushing weapon spec past compo 52 - there's 0 (zero) increase in damage modificator, and compo chance to hit (evade * miss rate) goes up by 1.5% (1.015) total, when increasing weapon from compo 52 to compo 64.ĭoublefrost has. The CS Garrote style is similar in numbers to DoubleFrost ,except the defence penalty (it increases enemy chance to hit even further ,bringing it up to 0% miss rate mainhand and 7% offhand), that penalty makes garrote a shoot-in-your-own-foot style. When using 1h weapons, there is no point pushing weapon spec past compo 52 - there's 0 (zero) increase in damage modificator, and compo chance to hit (evade * miss rate) goes up by 1.5% (1.015) total, when increasing weapon from compo 52 to compo 64.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |